First Opinion is STAT’s platform for attention-grabbing, illuminating, and provocative articles concerning the life sciences writ massive, written by biotech insiders, well being care employees, researchers, and others.
To encourage strong, good-faith dialogue about points raised in First Opinion essays, STAT publishes chosen Letters to the Editor obtained in response to them. You’ll be able to submit a Letter to the Editor right here, or discover the submission kind on the finish of any First Opinion essay.
The story
“Medical colleges want to supply college students options to state doctor well being packages,” by J. Wesley Boyd
The response
The Dec. 11 article by J. Wesley Boyd is disappointing as a result of it depends on anecdotal and deceptive proof, and harmful as a result of the tone will drive medical college students away from a lifesaving useful resource, particularly Doctor Well being Applications (PHPs). Opposite to claims that packages like PHPs are overused, they continue to be underutilized by medical college students who might vastly profit from elevated referrals and monetary help to entry these very important assets. As a board-certified psychiatrist, dependancy drugs specialist, present medical director of a PHP, president of the Federation of State Doctor Well being Applications, and previous participant, I’ve seen the transformative impression of PHPs firsthand. PHPs have one of many highest long-term success charges for treating substance use issues and psychological well being circumstances. Presently, over 5,000 physicians, trainees, and college students nationwide depend on PHPs to regain their well being and proceed their careers, finally benefiting tens of millions of sufferers by way of competent, compassionate care. Misinformation about PHPs discourages these in want. Anecdotal accounts, reminiscent of these highlighted on this article, typically lack crucial context. Tales influenced by private grievances or incomplete understanding distort the position PHPs play in serving to struggling well being professionals. PHPs work underneath numerous authorized and structural frameworks, and their procedures — like these of Tennessee Medical Basis-PHP (TMF) — prioritize individualized care and equity.
TMF, for example, conducts triage assessments and refers people for unbiased evaluations, typically coated by TMF’s grants for college kids to reduce monetary obstacles. The Washington Physicians Well being Program even companions with establishments to totally cowl analysis prices. Opposite to claims, PHPs don’t obtain kickbacks for referrals. They function transparently, adhering to strict pointers that eradicate conflicts of curiosity. The shortage of packages geared up to handle safety-sensitive professionals typically necessitates out-of-state referrals. These packages that consider a individuals’ health to follow are essentially resource-intensive. Research present PHP individuals obtain distinctive outcomes, with decrease malpractice danger and relapse charges than friends. In a follow-up survey, 85% of individuals deemed the associated fee “effectively price it.” But stigmatizing narratives like this text deter physicians and college students from in search of assist, exacerbating burnout, dependancy, and suicide danger, whereas jeopardizing affected person security. PHPs have saved extra lives and careers than some other doctor well being mannequin. As a substitute of stigmatizing PHPs, we must always rejoice their lifesaving work and give attention to addressing the systemic obstacles physicians and college students face when in search of assist. The medical career should tackle inaccuracies about PHPs to safeguard public well being and help our most susceptible members.
— Michael Baron, M.D., M.P.H., Federation of State Doctor Well being Applications, Tennessee Medical Basis, Vanderbilt College, Faculty of Drugs
